Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2015/12/writeup-pwnable-tiny-and-tiny-easy/ #20

Open
utterances-bot opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

2015/12/writeup-pwnable-tiny-and-tiny-easy/ #20

utterances-bot opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
Comments 💬 Comments from utterances

Comments

@utterances-bot
Copy link

utterances-bot commented Jun 1, 2021

Writeup-Pwnable: tiny & tiny_easy - /home/cubl

Hack, CTF, Writeup, Exploitation, ROP

https://cubar.co/2015/12/writeup-pwnable-tiny-and-tiny-easy/

@cubarco cubarco added the Comments 💬 Comments from utterances label Jun 1, 2021 — with utterances
@cubarco
Copy link
Owner

cubarco commented Jun 1, 2021

Original author: 1
Original date: 2019-04-25T08:05:45Z

2019年做这道题,发现gadget里面最多的add esp,0x1c,差的太多了,没有add esp,0x3c了。而且0x5c8看了也不是博主的指令了。估计你的公开之后,出题人把题目改了。我的天,eax值就没法搞了。

@cubarco
Copy link
Owner

cubarco commented Jun 1, 2021

Original author: Cubarco @cubarco
Original date: 2019-04-25T08:15:04Z

居然改了,改天做做看

@cubarco
Copy link
Owner

cubarco commented Jun 1, 2021

Original author: 大佬求带
Original date: 2019-04-28T00:59:17Z

不是改了,是把系统升级了,做题方法和tiny_hard一样了,然后就不知道下一步怎么搞了。

@cubarco
Copy link
Owner

cubarco commented Jun 1, 2021

Original author: 1
Original date: 2019-05-05T06:49:07Z

大佬,有思路吗?

@cubarco
Copy link
Owner

cubarco commented Jun 1, 2021

Original author: Cubarco @cubarco
Original date: 2019-05-05T07:36:46Z

改天(a few years later

@cubarco
Copy link
Owner

cubarco commented Jun 1, 2021

Original author: 1
Original date: 2019-05-09T07:40:39Z

大佬,能把flag给我一份不,我提交了去看看其他人的Writeup

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Comments 💬 Comments from utterances
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants