Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we archive this repository? #201

Open
HealthyPear opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Should we archive this repository? #201

HealthyPear opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@HealthyPear
Copy link
Member

HealthyPear commented Jun 27, 2023

With the advent of DataPipe and magic-cta-pipe, this project is basically obsolete.

I do not see any further development since I left my previous position.

Should we archive this repository as read-only?

@kosack

If it makes sense, should we perhaps first add a banner to the documentation saying that the project is frozen and not expected to continue?

@kosack
Copy link
Contributor

kosack commented Jun 27, 2023

We don't yet have a fully end-to-end DataPipe yet, so maybe let's wait a bit. THough it's true, mostly the functionality of protopipe has been extracted and moved to either ctapipe or elsewhere. Not sure what magic-cta-pipe does, but it's also not quite a replacement.

But yes, adding a banner for now is a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants