Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

on-premises support: Managed Services using the Kubernetes Operator Pattern #283

Closed
jbw976 opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

on-premises support: Managed Services using the Kubernetes Operator Pattern #283

jbw976 opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jbw976
Labels
design roadmap Issues that have priority and are included in the roadmap, or are candidates to add to the roadmap

Comments

@jbw976
Copy link
Member

jbw976 commented Jan 18, 2019

Many useful services can be deployed and managed using the Operator pattern with CRDs. Most of the time, these services are run in-cluster. Crossplane should support services that have operators, for example the services that Rook supports. Just a few examples:

Portable and dynamic provisioning of these resources should be supported and fit into the existing Crossplane ResourceClass and ResourceClaim model.

Some early proof of concept work of this support using Rook's CockroachDB operator can be found in this Rook fork.
@jbw976 jbw976 added this to the v0.2 milestone Jan 18, 2019
@jbw976 jbw976 self-assigned this Jan 18, 2019
@giacomoguiulfo
Copy link

Found this and thought it might useful for the purposes of this project: https://github.com/awslabs/aws-service-operator. Cheers!

@jbw976 jbw976 modified the milestones: v0.2, v0.3 Apr 2, 2019
@jbw976 jbw976 changed the title Managed Services using the Kubernetes Operator Pattern on-premises support: Managed Services using the Kubernetes Operator Pattern Jun 10, 2019
@jbw976 jbw976 added the roadmap Issues that have priority and are included in the roadmap, or are candidates to add to the roadmap label Jun 10, 2019
@jbw976 jbw976 removed this from the v0.3 milestone Jun 10, 2019
@prasek prasek mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2019
Closed
7 tasks
@hasheddan
Copy link
Member

Closed in favor of #862

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jbw976 jbw976

Labels
design roadmap Issues that have priority and are included in the roadmap, or are candidates to add to the roadmap
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jbw976 @giacomoguiulfo @hasheddan