Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NoteWorthy XBB.1* descendent with S:L455F and S:F456L #1925

Closed
krosa1910 opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

NoteWorthy XBB.1* descendent with S:L455F and S:F456L #1925

krosa1910 opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
duplicate This is an overlap or duplication of an existing proposal XBB proposed sublineage of XBB

Comments

@krosa1910
Copy link

Sub-Lineage of XBB.1* (It has the G252V mutation, but interestingly lack G8*)
Mutations on top of XBB.1*: C2509T, G22927T, T22928C, T27531C
Gisaid Inquiry: Spike_V445P,Spike_L455F,Spike_F456L, T27531C
Earliest sequence: EPI_ISL_16598936|2023-01-08 Pakistan
Latest sequence: EPI_ISL_17501368|2023-04-04 Pakistan
Gisaid Inquiry Result:
EPI_ISL_16598936, EPI_ISL_16996058, EPI_ISL_16996643,
EPI_ISL_17007038, EPI_ISL_17098465, EPI_ISL_17373383,
EPI_ISL_17389621, EPI_ISL_17501368, EPI_ISL_17501379,
Regions: Pakistan (seemingly origin), Isareal (Imported?), UK (weird, probably travel?)
Usher Tree:https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_75d2_167620.json?c=gt-ORF8_8&f_userOrOld=uploaded%20sample&gt=S.455F,456L,252V&label=id:node_3139017
CA1F890A-3FCF-4BF3-A124-1E2B20DCE89B

This is quite interesting because when I was searching S:455, a powerful escape site of XBB mentioned in a past twitter of jbloomlab, I see that S:L455F could be potentially advantageous, so I perform a search with S:445P and S:455F. That give me utter gibberish with about 28 Gisaid Sequences in the USHER tree that is mostly manually put together with non 455F branches. Yet there is a subbranch with S:F456L, the opposite of what we see at S:L455F.
That branch turned out to be of much higher quality, as USHER successfully put 9 Gisaid lineage and 6 open lineage together all bearing the same mutations. So I would like to nominate this lineage.
Not only does it show a decent escape, but the fact that those two RBD mutations are relatively speaking not changing amino acid much themselves and complementary means that this mutation probably keep a good protein structure of XBB, so it could be a free cake escape combination and being advantageous.
Note: there is one new Chilean lineage if the Gisaid inquiry is simply S:445P and the two defining RBD mutations of this lineage, but it is put on a different branch and has S:486P, so I am not sure whether that also belong to my definition.

@thomasppeacock thomasppeacock added the XBB proposed sublineage of XBB label Apr 20, 2023
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @krosa1910 already proposed in #1681 .

cc @thomasppeacock

@krosa1910
Copy link
Author

Hi @krosa1910 already proposed in #1681 .

cc @thomasppeacock

Sorry, I would close this.

@thomasppeacock thomasppeacock added the duplicate This is an overlap or duplication of an existing proposal label Apr 20, 2023
@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @krosa1910 already proposed in #1681 .
cc @thomasppeacock

Sorry, I would close this.

no worry it is always better being more than one in discovering new lineages

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

SO @krosa1910 i suggest you to reopen this one, you have the clear picture and could monitor the two better than me. please.

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

@krosa1910 pls reopen this one in the other page

@FedeGueli
Copy link
Contributor

Designated XBB.1.48 via d980960

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This is an overlap or duplication of an existing proposal XBB proposed sublineage of XBB
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants