-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add separator between resource types #22
Comments
I do not insist on specific format, I would like something which clearly distinct different resource types |
@grzesuav The long-term plan is to output exactly the same as However, until then I can improve the current printer. I'm a bit reluctant to add these headings, as this is also not the way how |
Yes, definitely will be better. Could you also link here upstream issue ? Thank you :) |
@grzesuav After trying this out, I don't think that empty lines will improve the readability of the output. For example,
Which looks quite odd and does not improve readability for me. This would not change, if the header were repeated for every group. Besides, I think that no lines in between is more in line with However, I'm considering to colorize the result. That might help a bit. |
Yes, but I was basing on just |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently we get one list for all resource types. Would be useful to have it grouped by resource type.
Currently
Describe the solution you'd like
Proposal
Describe alternatives you've considered
I was basing how
k get all
works.Additional context
In case of namespace with a lot of resources - there is easier visually to look at results
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: