-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 862
buildah: move passwd command to tests
#6264
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@mtrmac PTAL |
mtrmac
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Thanks for handling this!
|
@containers/buildah-maintainers PTAL |
|
I think we'll need to update |
|
I'm fine with the current PR as-is if it helps to speed up merge. I can add below patch in a followup. Haven't actually tested it yet and TMT jobs are slowly trudging along given the recent fedora outage and resulting backlog. So, I guess we can't count on the TMT jobs here anyway. |
|
@lsm5 Done. |
|
@flouthoc the tests are failing. |
|
Integration tests were flakes I have restarted them. |
|
@flouthoc ohh my bad. Need this diff too: |
|
|
|
@nalind PTAL |
Is this testing podman-next, I guess the thing here is crun chnage how the value gets calculated |
I don't think there should be any assumption in the way cpu-shares are converted, this is an implementation detail and my suggestion is to skip the test on cgroup v2. For cgroup v2, we'd need to expose the equivalent of |
|
Opened #6271, though it could instead have switched over to using "dumpspec" as a runtime and limited itself to checking that we set the right field in the runtime spec. |
|
LGTM |
containers#6182 Signed-off-by: flouthoc <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: flouthoc <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: flouthoc <[email protected]>
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
2 similar comments
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
|
@containers/buildah-maintainers PTAL |
|
/lgtm |
Closes #6182
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
How to verify it
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?