You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 8, 2020. It is now read-only.
problem
currently all tests check that the method to be tested is implemented. this may be inconvenient if the class under test is an extension of another class and reuses the super classes method with overriding it. in case that the super class is an abstract class it may not be possible to test this implementation with the current architecture of the beast.
question
should the method implementation test be turned on or off by default? what is the more common use case?
solution
add a configuration to the abstract test builder to allow the user to enabled/disable the method implementation check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
problem
currently all tests check that the method to be tested is implemented. this may be inconvenient if the class under test is an extension of another class and reuses the super classes method with overriding it. in case that the super class is an abstract class it may not be possible to test this implementation with the current architecture of the beast.
question
should the method implementation test be turned on or off by default? what is the more common use case?
solution
add a configuration to the abstract test builder to allow the user to enabled/disable the method implementation check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: