Labels
Labels
32 labels
- Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value
- Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly
- Something isn't working
- Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments)
- Judge has reviewed and integrated all feedback
- Improvements or additions to documentation
- Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue
- This issue or pull request already exists
- New feature or request
- Judge should review this issue
- Extra attention is needed
- This report is of especially high quality
- Discussion about this issue is ongoing, and not yet resolved.
- This doesn't seem right
- This report is of especially low quality
- This finding falls outside the contest scope as delineated in the contest README
- Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%)
- Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%)
- Highest quality submission among a set of duplicates
- Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
- Further information is requested
- Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix)
- satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
- This submission will be included/highlighted in the audit report
- Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
- Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
- Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue
- does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards