Replies: 1 comment
-
As indicated on the test catalog call today there have been restrictions and motivations in the past that may no longer be relevant. There have also been some motivations and areas that were ambiguous and "externally applied to the project" which slowed down the progress of the test suite. If we can motivations, use cases, and goals which have more clarity as well as remove unnecessary limits and ambiguity then the progress, long term viability, and chances for success will improve Next steps:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
There is a need for a reassessment of the test suite goals and overall improvements for usability and maintainability has been building within the Test Suite community (eg. end users, contributors, upstream projects).
This need has come as a result of direct explicit and indirect analysis of usage and engagement within the community such as people going through the certification process which uses the test suite, companies utilizing the test suite as part of their product life cycle (eg. in development + testing CI/CD pipelines), upstream projects attempting to contribute to tests, and explicitly by community members wanting to help with usability and maintenance improvements.
For example TietoEvry has proposed improvements and major updates for the Test Suite. The original presentation given to the CNTI Test Catalog community (on March 12th, 2024) can be viewed at https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nuobTVOK1N1o7XvOJCLfMFJhTzgZJBG-/edit
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions