Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some problems with training and validation #16

Open
zi1zi opened this issue Jul 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Some problems with training and validation #16

zi1zi opened this issue Jul 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@zi1zi
Copy link

zi1zi commented Jul 28, 2023

Thanks for the great work, I have the following questions

  1. I have trained 30 fonts, some images of the training process are as follows, I don’t think 65w iter is needed, as shown in the figure
    511e233eddf26c1bc4f702f6e257f7bc
  2. Verification in training feels better than direct verification,The picture above is the verification during training, and the picture below is the direct verification
    0200000-unseen_chars
    6570e0afb2350a46a85b4b16c81cd94e
    3.The overall effect is not very good, I have the following guesses:
    (1) There are few types of training fonts or the number of characters in each font is small (I use 800)
    (2) The number of training 20w iter is too small
    (3) There is an error in the use of the verification code. I use inference.py for verification.But I don't know what's the difference between the two
    image
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant