Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rocket.chat integration #22

Open
sdorra opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

rocket.chat integration #22

sdorra opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sdorra
Copy link
Member

sdorra commented Nov 30, 2015

Rocket.Chat + Hubot integration to get a powerful chat.ops tool. I think we have to build our own cas plugin for a full integration, bu we can start with ldap authentication.

@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Feb 13, 2016

Perfect match: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat#2183

@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Feb 15, 2016

But there is a other problem, which blocks us from integration rocket.chat:

@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Mar 29, 2016

PR 2624 seems to fix the problem.

@sdorra sdorra self-assigned this Aug 11, 2016
@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Aug 11, 2016

I've started the integration on branch feature/22-rocketchat

@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Aug 11, 2016

There is problem with the integrated cas authentication. I've created a PR to fix this problem:

@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Aug 11, 2016

There are some cas related issues, which are required to fix for a seamless integration:

@konsumate
Copy link

@sdorra Most of the related & referenced RC CAS issues are implemented. Happy hacking!

@sdorra
Copy link
Member Author

sdorra commented Oct 5, 2016

@CoreCache thanks for the notification. But after a short test with version RC version 0.42.0 we run into the next sub directory bug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants