Implement VA Table

[p-a-s-c-a-l]

Implement the VA Table following the Mock-Up and the approach described here.

Open Questions

This is the current VA Table Mock-Up:

@stefanon @bernhardsk: Does 'high', medium' 'low' make sense in this context? What are "vulnerability levels" and how are they calculated / defined? Is this mock-up still valid?

According to CLARITY tables_mod.xlsx, the VA table should rather look like:

Questions:

• why different values for HW and PF? Shouldn't the table show the number/m³,m², ... of Elements at Risk for each vulnerability class in the study area? How can they be different for each Hazard?
• what's then the difference to the EE Table, which shows also the elements at risk grouped by vulnerability classes?

[p-a-s-c-a-l]

@stefanon @bernhardsk Any advise here?

[p-a-s-c-a-l]

This component is probably obsolete. In the long term, we would provide some Vulnerability Curves Editor that used the respective EMIKAT VA API.