-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VS2017: separate layout options in a separate file #4
Comments
@rismoney have you seen this: Is what you are suggesting in this issue similar to what is possible using that package? |
i think that stuff is great there, but it is far too abstracted and/or segmented. Many enterprises just want a prefab set of workloads. The updater side can include as many workloads as you want, but the installer must always be a subset. I maintain 1:1, but it's trivial to create "spinoff" packages or parameter packages using the same source, and a different json, but I avoided that and created a standard install after polling the devs to provide a workload spec. I think the alternate json files approach provides a better wrapper versus micromanaging workloads in an enterprise. If you really had to partition your devs, i'd prefer groups of workloads versus individual specification. Finally while those scripts/packages handle creating layouts and whatnot, my goal was also not to treat VS like a snowflake, and instead manage it like any other package. Thats why I put the package assembly into AU. Anytime a new version is published, it is easily consumable via choco upgrade. Totally hands off. |
@rismoney thanks for getting back to me. That makes perfect sense, I just wanted to make sure that we were avoiding duplication of effort. |
recommended by @majkinetor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: