Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first draft commit #601

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

first draft commit #601

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mojtaba-esk
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #583

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

return nil, ErrUsernameAlreadyTaken
}

fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user)

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Clear-text logging of sensitive information High

Sensitive data returned by an access to Password
flows to a logging call.

Copilot Autofix AI about 24 hours ago

To fix the problem, we need to ensure that sensitive information such as passwords is not logged in clear text. Instead, we should either obfuscate the sensitive information or omit it entirely from the logs. In this case, we will omit the password from the logs to prevent any potential exposure of sensitive data.

We will modify the logging statement on line 48 to exclude the password field from the user object. This can be done by creating a copy of the user object with the password field set to an obfuscated value (e.g., "****") before logging it.

Suggested changeset 1
internal/api/v1/services/user.go

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/internal/api/v1/services/user.go b/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
--- a/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
+++ b/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
@@ -47,3 +47,5 @@
 
-	fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user)
+	userCopy := *user
+	userCopy.Password = "****"
+	fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", userCopy)
 
EOF
@@ -47,3 +47,5 @@

fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user)
userCopy := *user
userCopy.Password = "****"
fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", userCopy)

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
return nil, err
}

fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Clear-text logging of sensitive information High

Sensitive data returned by an access to Password
flows to a logging call.

Copilot Autofix AI about 24 hours ago

To fix the problem, we should remove the logging of the password in clear text. Instead, we can log a message indicating that an authentication attempt was made without revealing the actual password. This way, we maintain the ability to debug authentication issues without exposing sensitive information.

  • Remove the lines that log the password in clear text.
  • Add a log message that indicates an authentication attempt without revealing the password.
Suggested changeset 1
internal/api/v1/services/user.go

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/internal/api/v1/services/user.go b/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
--- a/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
+++ b/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
@@ -68,4 +68,3 @@
 
-	fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
-	fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)
+	fmt.Println("Authentication attempt for user:", username)
 	if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil {
EOF
@@ -68,4 +68,3 @@

fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)
fmt.Println("Authentication attempt for user:", username)
if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil {
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
}

fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Clear-text logging of sensitive information High

Sensitive data returned by an access to password
flows to a logging call.

Copilot Autofix AI about 24 hours ago

To fix the problem, we need to ensure that sensitive information such as passwords is not logged in clear text. Instead, we should either obfuscate the password or avoid logging it altogether. The best way to fix this without changing existing functionality is to remove the logging of the password entirely, as it is not necessary for the application's functionality.

We will make changes to the internal/api/v1/services/user.go file, specifically to the Authenticate method, to remove the logging of the password variable.

Suggested changeset 1
internal/api/v1/services/user.go

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/internal/api/v1/services/user.go b/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
--- a/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
+++ b/internal/api/v1/services/user.go
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@
 
-	fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
-	fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)
+	// fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
+	// fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)
 	if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil {
EOF
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@

fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)
// fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password)
// fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password)
if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil {
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pass through API
1 participant