-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
first draft commit #601
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
first draft commit #601
Conversation
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
return nil, ErrUsernameAlreadyTaken | ||
} | ||
|
||
fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Clear-text logging of sensitive information High
Sensitive data returned by an access to Password
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI about 24 hours ago
To fix the problem, we need to ensure that sensitive information such as passwords is not logged in clear text. Instead, we should either obfuscate the sensitive information or omit it entirely from the logs. In this case, we will omit the password from the logs to prevent any potential exposure of sensitive data.
We will modify the logging statement on line 48 to exclude the password field from the user
object. This can be done by creating a copy of the user
object with the password field set to an obfuscated value (e.g., "****") before logging it.
-
Copy modified lines R48-R50
@@ -47,3 +47,5 @@ | ||
|
||
fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", user) | ||
userCopy := *user | ||
userCopy.Password = "****" | ||
fmt.Printf("user: %#v\n", userCopy) | ||
|
return nil, err | ||
} | ||
|
||
fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Clear-text logging of sensitive information High
Sensitive data returned by an access to Password
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI about 24 hours ago
To fix the problem, we should remove the logging of the password in clear text. Instead, we can log a message indicating that an authentication attempt was made without revealing the actual password. This way, we maintain the ability to debug authentication issues without exposing sensitive information.
- Remove the lines that log the password in clear text.
- Add a log message that indicates an authentication attempt without revealing the password.
-
Copy modified line R69
@@ -68,4 +68,3 @@ | ||
|
||
fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) | ||
fmt.Println("Authentication attempt for user:", username) | ||
if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil { |
} | ||
|
||
fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Clear-text logging of sensitive information High
Sensitive data returned by an access to password
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI about 24 hours ago
To fix the problem, we need to ensure that sensitive information such as passwords is not logged in clear text. Instead, we should either obfuscate the password or avoid logging it altogether. The best way to fix this without changing existing functionality is to remove the logging of the password entirely, as it is not necessary for the application's functionality.
We will make changes to the internal/api/v1/services/user.go
file, specifically to the Authenticate
method, to remove the logging of the password
variable.
-
Copy modified lines R69-R70
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ | ||
|
||
fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) | ||
// fmt.Printf("user.Password: `%s`\n", user.Password) | ||
// fmt.Printf("password: `%s`\n", password) | ||
if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword([]byte(user.Password), []byte(password)); err != nil { |
Closes #583