Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support signing of images #157

Open
cppforlife opened this issue Sep 9, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

support signing of images #157

cppforlife opened this issue Sep 9, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
carvel accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed enhancement This issue is a feature request priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@cppforlife
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the problem/challenge you have

i would like to be able to sign images with cosign that are built by kbld. this should work regardless of the builder i use (similar to tagging).

Describe the solution you'd like

Anything else you would like to add:


Vote on this request

This is an invitation to the community to vote on issues, to help us prioritize our backlog. Use the "smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

👍 "I would like to see this addressed as soon as possible"
👎 "There are other more important things to focus on right now"

We are also happy to receive and review Pull Requests if you want to help working on this issue.

@cppforlife cppforlife added enhancement This issue is a feature request carvel triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity labels Sep 9, 2021
@aaronshurley
Copy link
Contributor

@cppforlife Thanks for creating this issue. We definitely want to support signing images so the main question is "when" do we want to prioritize this work since it will take some cross-tool collaboration. Any urgency or rough timelines that you'd like to see this work done by?

@cppforlife
Copy link
Contributor Author

at this point just putting placeholders where i thought functionality should live.

@aaronshurley aaronshurley added carvel accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed carvel triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity labels Oct 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
carvel accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed enhancement This issue is a feature request priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
Status: To Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants