You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inclusive Practices in a Carpentries Workshop notes "We will discuss the Code of Conduct in greater detail in Part 4 of this training during our discussion of Working with your team."
This is actually in episode/part 21, so I offer two suggestions:
Consistency in how we refer to segments of our lessons, as "part" or "episode" etc.
Linking to that section when we refer to it.
Which part of the content does your suggestion apply to?
I see the "part" designations now in the sidebar ToC. We note when each part has a break and when each part ends but do not note when each part begins. It could be implicitly understood but maybe make that more explicit?
for part 1/3 this is straightforward, we can change the titles of the welcome episodes.
For part 2/4 maybe it's worth adding a small welcome episode to each. I know in practice, I tend to do some sort of warmup/icebreaker at these points anyway, so it would impact the documented time, but possibly bring it closer to real world time?
(the end part 1 and end part 3 are ~ "break" episodes)
How could the content be improved?
Inclusive Practices in a Carpentries Workshop notes "We will discuss the Code of Conduct in greater detail in Part 4 of this training during our discussion of Working with your team."
This is actually in episode/part 21, so I offer two suggestions:
Which part of the content does your suggestion apply to?
https://carpentries.github.io/instructor-training/09-eia.html#inclusive-practices-in-a-carpentries-workshop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: