[Enhancement] Move camera_quality_test.py to checkbox-support for other providers utilizing it

[baconYao]

Enhancement Proposal

Reason

In many cases, due to various factors such as MIPI camera NDA, proprietary drivers, and others, many camera-related test items need to be implemented within each provider.

• Nvidia has its own GStreamer and camera pipelines.
• Qualcomm has numerous GStreamer and camera pipelines.
• MediaTek has setup actions and User Space NDA Middleware, among others.

These vendor-specific tests make it challenging to integrate them into the base provider.

Additionally, it is often difficult to use the test cases in the base provider smoothly
- id: camera/roundtrip-qrcode_{{ name }}

• Be used for almost all IoT devices
• scanning a QR code requires a display/monitor to show the QR code

Since these vendor-specific tests focus on the output of camera and input of SoC can negotiate with different resolutions, colorspaces, formats, etc., (MediaTek with OnSemi AP1302+AR0830 or MediaTek with Sony IMX214), relying solely on manual judgment results in a heavy burden and cannot be effectively verified during SRU.

After reviewing the content of camera_quality_test.py, I believe this script could be adapted in the following two ways to bring greater benefits to everyone:

• Move it from the base provider to checkbox-support.
  • Advantage: All providers can use the same set of validation standards, significantly aiding the automation of vendor-specific case validation.
• Expand its capabilities to validate not only single photos but also video files.
  • Advantage: Whether it's a video or a photo, this method can be used for validation.

[syncronize-issues-to-jira]

Thank you for reporting your feedback to us!

The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/CHECKBOX-1715.

This message was autogenerated