Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate funding via Indigogo or kickstarter #13

Open
KoryNunn opened this issue Aug 18, 2015 · 9 comments
Open

Investigate funding via Indigogo or kickstarter #13

KoryNunn opened this issue Aug 18, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@KoryNunn
Copy link

The common theme amongst the budgeting issues seem to be around organisers not knowing exactly how much things will cost, or how many people will attend.

Indigogo or kickstarter may potentially improve both of these issues, by increasing visibility, and allowing for dynamic conference "features" as the funds go up.

I would personally love to put my money forward as soon as possible (and let others to the same) so we can get a bit of momentum happening. CampJS is about all the people who attend, and being able to see a lot of interest would encourage others to attend.

@KoryNunn
Copy link
Author

FYI this may not work this time around, but maybe in the future.

@DamonOehlman
Copy link
Contributor

@KoryNunn great idea mate. I agree that doing something like this in the future would be an awesome idea. I particular like the idea of stretch goals (e.g. a bouncy castle).

CampJS is about all the people who attend, and being able to see a lot of interest would encourage others to attend.

I completely agree here also. I wonder if we should do something on the CampJS VI site that shows who is attending meetup.com style so people get that visibility...

@MauriceButler
Copy link
Member

Agree visibility of attendees on the site would be great.

@garrows
Copy link

garrows commented Aug 18, 2015

This would probably be really good for sponsors too.

@rvagg
Copy link

rvagg commented Aug 18, 2015

I like this idea, rewards can be tied to standard sponsor entitlements although I imagine many corporates would be hesitant to participate in it in this way and would rather be billed and pay directly.

@SomeoneWeird
Copy link
Member

I'm sure we could work something out if we end up doing this eventually.

@mipearson
Copy link

I like this idea, rewards can be tied to standard sponsor entitlements although I imagine many corporates would be hesitant to participate in it in this way and would rather be billed and pay directly.

Speaking as a "corporate": at the lower sponsorship tiers it makes sense.

@MauriceButler
Copy link
Member

Additional thing to think about is the ~5% cut these places take.

Maybe that is acceptable for the benefits but need to keep in mind.

@bguiz
Copy link

bguiz commented Oct 2, 2015

Apart form KS/IGG, there's also Pozible, which is based here, and transacts in AUD. Worth considering for that alone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants