You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd like to think that, for massive changes to json structures, parsing into, using, then marshaling out of an AST should be more performant than a gjson/sjson pair that has to re-parse newly returned []byte. One convenience feature that is missing is the ability to delete at any depth by path (...any for ast.Node style).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd like to think that, for massive changes to json structures, parsing into, using, then marshaling out of an AST should be more performant than a gjson/sjson pair that has to re-parse newly returned
[]byte
. One convenience feature that is missing is the ability to delete at any depth by path (...any for ast.Node style).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: