BUG: this.theBridgeSettings.getConfigfile() on line 228 in com.bwssystems.HABridge.BridgeSettings is a null instance WITH existing config file in parameter -Dconfig.file=/opt/habridge/data/habridge.config.test

[jayjupdhig]

I think now it's time to investigate finally from the side of the HA-Bridge developers!!

So i changed the code in that class to:

System.out.println("this.theBridgeSettings.getConfigfile(): " + this.theBridgeSettings.getConfigfile());    
    System.out.println("EXIT NOW");
    System.exit(0);
    
    
    setupParams(Paths.get(this.theBridgeSettings.getConfigfile(), new String[0]), ".cfgbk", "habridge.config-");
    

Which results in that output:

this.theBridgeSettings.getConfigfile(): null
EXIT NOW

Whole command:

/usr/bin/java -jar -Dconfig.file=/opt/habridge/data/habridge.config.test /opt/habridge/ha-bridge.jar

Cat of /opt/habridge/data/habridge.config.test:

cat /opt/habridge/data/habridge.config.test
{"broadlinkconfigured":false,"buttonsleep":100,"domoticzconfigured":false,"farenheit":true,"fhemconfigured":false,"fibaroconfigured":false,"halconfigured":false,"harmonyconfigured":false,"hassconfigured":false,"homewizardconfigured":false,"hubversion":"9999999999","hueconfigured":false,"lifxconfigured":false,"mqttconfigured":false,"myechourl":"echo.amazon.com/#cards","nestconfigured":false,"numberoflogmessages":512,"openhabconfigured":false,"serverport":"80","settingsChanged":false,"somfyconfigured":false,"traceupnp":false,"upnpconfigaddress":"192.168.178.5","upnpdevicedb":"/opt/habridge/data/device.db","upnpgroupdb":"/opt/habridge/data/group.db","upnpresponseport":50000,"upnpsenddelay":650,"upnpstrict":true,"userooms":false,"useupnpiface":false,"veraconfigured":false,"webaddress":"192.168.178.5","upnporiginal":true}

So:

a.) Current, most up-to-date versions of openjdk-8 and openjdk-9 and Raspbian 9 OS does not make any difference

b.) JSON config file is minimized/compressed or not does also not make any difference

Thanks in advance for your feedback(s)!

Regards, Jan

[jayjupdhig]

Without my code lines (=original code) it results in that behavior:
#1239

So please investigate ASAP!

[jayjupdhig]

I've found the problem, it was in the ha bridge source code and NOT due to my configuration.

@HA-Bridge developers:

Please contact me via PM, so i can see you are interested or not (which seems to be, at least i.m.o) to prevent that behavior (maybe for future users) by fixing that bug.

Otherwise, it will stay my dirty little secret... ;-)

[jayjupdhig]

You can also contact me with habridge-bug-2 (at) crapmail.org

So closed... ;-)

[jayjupdhig]

"Please contact me via PM, so i can see you are interested or not (which seems to be, at least i.m.o) to prevent that behavior (maybe for future users) by fixing that bug."

You can also contact me via habridge-bug-2 (AT) crapmail.org ...

(habridge-bug-2 (AT) crapmail.org which is a redirect to my inbox is exactly active for 1 month from yesterday...)

If you have any questions regarding that issue, so please don't hesitate to contact me - youre welcome!! ;-)

[jayjupdhig]

Re-opened...

[jayjupdhig]

#1239

[kosuodhmwa]

Same problem here!!

[bwssytems]

Duplicate of #1239