Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: default model #41

Closed
sunt05 opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Feature request: default model #41

sunt05 opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@sunt05
Copy link

sunt05 commented Mar 29, 2023

Thanks for the great work!

Can we add an option to set default model?
I understand this can be done by inserting the front matter; however, for some prompt conversion initiated within an existing note, the model is always got-3.5 and cannot meet my needs.

@bramses
Copy link
Owner

bramses commented Apr 2, 2023

Hi @sunt05,

I can look into it, that's a pretty easy fix. May I ask why "model" in frontmatter is not sufficient though?

@sunt05
Copy link
Author

sunt05 commented Apr 2, 2023

Thanks for your follow-up @bramses !

Because I find if I initiate a chat by adding a chat divider in an arbitrary note without including a front matter, the chat seems always based on GPT-3.5 though I have changed the default front matter with "model" being "GPT-4" in the global settings for ChatGPT-md.

@lukemt
Copy link

lukemt commented Apr 2, 2023

I see many people use chatgpt-md within existing notes and I am wondering if this is an intended use case and what’s actually going on if you do that. Doesn’t chatgpt-md send the entire content of the existing note to ChatGPT as a message and if so are people aware that this happens?

I believe for most users that do this would prefer a chatgpt-md section, that is „independent“ of the rest of the note.

What do you guys think about this?

@lukemt
Copy link

lukemt commented Apr 2, 2023

My comments are a topic of its own I think. Therefore I created a new discussion for it: #44 (should have done this in the first place)

@bramses
Copy link
Owner

bramses commented Apr 6, 2023

closing for now since @lukemt made the discussion!

@bramses bramses closed this as completed Apr 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants