Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

junitxml report support #344

Open
dmashine opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

junitxml report support #344

dmashine opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@dmashine
Copy link

dmashine commented Nov 14, 2024

# TODO: junitxml, html commands

Hello!
Pls add back option to have a junitxml report in new version.
Thank you!

@dmashine dmashine changed the title ]junitxml report support [mutmut3]junitxml report support Nov 14, 2024
@boxed
Copy link
Owner

boxed commented Nov 14, 2024

It wasn't a lot of code before, so it is probably easy to do. I personally don't use this feature (and kinda think it's a bad idea/useless), so I think someone else needs to do the work for this.

@boxed boxed changed the title [mutmut3]junitxml report support junitxml report support Nov 14, 2024
@dmashine
Copy link
Author

dmashine commented Nov 14, 2024

It is very, very useful in a CI/CD environment!

@boxed
Copy link
Owner

boxed commented Nov 14, 2024

I think running mutmut in CI is a bad idea itself. Mutmut is a tool to improve your tests. It's also way too expensive to run over and over again just to produce a report that people don't look at. If you care about your tests you should run mutmut on your machine when developing.

I've had this argument many times over the years. I am never convinced by the arguments to run it on some machine far away. I will accept PRs, but I will also keep saying it's stupid until someone can convince me it's a reasonable idea.

@boxed boxed closed this as completed Nov 14, 2024
@boxed boxed reopened this Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants