You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to have a setting, where each suitable mutation is only applied with a probability of x (e.g. 50%) for one mutation-run.
Then, being able to configure N mutation-runs (e.g. N=100), getting the stats on
average impact of a single mutation on the final score (independent of the others)
quality score per function
average impact scores of mutations within a function
This allows to break down the quality statistics on a lower level (e.g. functions, lines of code) to point towards subparts that are tested particularly well / week
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From a statistical point of view, you can get insights on "how many mutants do you need to affect the results of a test". As an example - test is not failing, two mutants are present in the function. How do you know which one is actually responsible? By (randomly) eliminating one mutant (over the N runs), you can assign importances to mutants, depending on how many tests are affected solely due to a single mutant
I would like to have a setting, where each suitable mutation is only applied with a probability of x (e.g. 50%) for one mutation-run.
Then, being able to configure N mutation-runs (e.g. N=100), getting the stats on
This allows to break down the quality statistics on a lower level (e.g. functions, lines of code) to point towards subparts that are tested particularly well / week
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: