Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Editing Requirements Page according to Customer Meeting 5. #180

Closed
1 task done
burakmert236 opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task done

Editing Requirements Page according to Customer Meeting 5. #180

burakmert236 opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@irfanbozkurt @burakmert236
Labels
Prio: Medium Importance of Issue: Medium Status: Accepted Issue is reviewed, accepted Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@burakmert236
Copy link
Contributor

burakmert236 commented Oct 17, 2022 •
edited by palahb
Loading

Description:

Requirements page will be updated according to revisions in Customer Meeting 5.

Todo's:

  • Updating requirements page.

Reviewer: @Oozankilic @enginoguzhansenol

Task Deadline: 17.10.2022 18:00
Review Deadline: 18.10.2022 12:00
@burakmert236 burakmert236 added Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Prio: Medium Importance of Issue: Medium Status: Need Review Issue work is done, waiting to be reviewed labels Oct 17, 2022
@burakmert236
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made necessary changes to the requirements page, reviewers may have a look at it.

@enginoguzhansenol
Copy link
Contributor

I reviewed the changes made to the requirements. Nice work. I have noticed a small detail in the glossary.

Activity history: Information of creating posts, comments, giving upvotes, downvotes shown in the profile of a registered member. Posts, comments and upvotes/downvotes can be accessed in separate sections of profile pages.

  • Activity history will not include the downvotes as discussed in the last customer meeting.

The other changes look sufficient and adequate. After changing this misleading information, we can close to issue. Thank you for your collaboration.

@burakmert236
Copy link
Contributor Author

I made necessary changes, therefore I am closing to issue

@palahb palahb added Status: Accepted Issue is reviewed, accepted and removed Status: Need Review Issue work is done, waiting to be reviewed labels Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@irfanbozkurt irfanbozkurt

@burakmert236 burakmert236

Labels
Prio: Medium Importance of Issue: Medium Status: Accepted Issue is reviewed, accepted Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@irfanbozkurt @palahb @burakmert236 @enginoguzhansenol