You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now that we are including some images that have been rasterized and others that have not, I wonder whether we'd consider not rasterizing any. I know that a lot of hard work went into these images. And, I still don't think the pioneers of color are as "readable" as the white pioneers using this process and I wonder whether we could live with a design that just has uniform backgrounds. I assume this wouldn't be a huge amount of work because the OG images are saved somewhere.
(More specifically, I am currently rereading all of the posters to identify our most accessible subset and learned that I was completely confused about the identity of one of our pioneers based on the image we are including, having looked at the images of these pioneers a million times and read their stories far fewer times.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now that we are including some images that have been rasterized and others that have not, I wonder whether we'd consider not rasterizing any. I know that a lot of hard work went into these images. And, I still don't think the pioneers of color are as "readable" as the white pioneers using this process and I wonder whether we could live with a design that just has uniform backgrounds. I assume this wouldn't be a huge amount of work because the OG images are saved somewhere.
(More specifically, I am currently rereading all of the posters to identify our most accessible subset and learned that I was completely confused about the identity of one of our pioneers based on the image we are including, having looked at the images of these pioneers a million times and read their stories far fewer times.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: