Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration tests should cover both strong and eventual consistency domains #543

Open
1 task done
kaikulimu opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done
Labels
A-Testing Area: Testing enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kaikulimu
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

Our integration test suite allows us to test on either strong (SC) or eventual (non-SC) consistency domains based on domain name. Some of our tests use the SC domain, while others use the non-SC domain.

Expected Behavior

We should standardize such that all integration tests cover both strong and eventual consistency domains.

Steps To Reproduce

Look at the codebase and you will find many examples, e.g.)

  1. test_admin_client.py tests on non-SC domain tc.DOMAIN_PRIORITY.
  2. test_auto_subscriptions.py tests on SC domain tc.DOMAIN_PRIORITY_SC.

BlazingMQ Version

0.93.5

Anything else?

No response

@kaikulimu kaikulimu added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request A-Testing Area: Testing and removed bug Something isn't working labels Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Testing Area: Testing enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant