You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our integration test suite allows us to test on either strong (SC) or eventual (non-SC) consistency domains based on domain name. Some of our tests use the SC domain, while others use the non-SC domain.
Expected Behavior
We should standardize such that all integration tests cover both strong and eventual consistency domains.
Steps To Reproduce
Look at the codebase and you will find many examples, e.g.)
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
Our integration test suite allows us to test on either strong (SC) or eventual (non-SC) consistency domains based on domain name. Some of our tests use the SC domain, while others use the non-SC domain.
Expected Behavior
We should standardize such that all integration tests cover both strong and eventual consistency domains.
Steps To Reproduce
Look at the codebase and you will find many examples, e.g.)
test_admin_client.py
tests on non-SC domaintc.DOMAIN_PRIORITY
.test_auto_subscriptions.py
tests on SC domaintc.DOMAIN_PRIORITY_SC
.BlazingMQ Version
0.93.5
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: