-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New BSIP: Escrow Services #44
Comments
I can help out technically on this one. |
As mentioned in one of the above posts by "Bangzi":
|
i was checking this and i actually think that if we follow what steem did, following step by step their commits up to where @abitmore improved it should be not very hard to add the same escrow features to bitshares. i am wondering how successful this approach is for steem and how much value it can add for our blockchain. if we agree that we are going to follow what steem did i can write the bsip and (if approved) work on it for the next hardfork release. |
@oxarbitrage Steem has no UIA so far, although they'll have SMT's soon. Also, their user base is different. So use case of this feature in Steem is limited. Of course we can copy it, but I think we can do better, anyway we need a BSIP first. I think it's too tight to finish it before next hard fork release (around May 2018). |
i see, we definitely want to include UIAs if possible. also @xeroc seems to be open to something more generic with bitshares/bitshares-core#692 i think this is important, we can start with a draft bsip following steem while we add the feature to UIAs. it might be too tight for the next hardfork but if you agree i can start writing the bsip. |
I think pull request #76 is for this issue. |
relating with bitshares/bitshares-core#866 |
|
Details to be worked on.
Related discussions:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23800.0.html
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24155.0.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: