Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Backport native 128-bit integers support from EOS #998

Closed
abitmore opened this issue May 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Backport native 128-bit integers support from EOS #998

abitmore opened this issue May 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@pmconrad
Labels
1c Task Task for team member to perform. Description may contain a Task List and reference child Sub-Tasks 2d Developing Status indicating currently designing and developing a solution 3c Enhancement Classification indicating a change to the functionality of the existing imlementation 4a Low Priority Priority indicating minimal impact to system/user -OR- an inexpensive workaround exists 6 Protocol Impact flag identifying the blockchain logic, consensus, validation, etc. 6 Security Impact flag identifying system/user security
Milestone
3.3.0 - Feature R...

Comments

@abitmore
Copy link
Member

Related commit: EOSIO/eos@ab87a83

Probably low priority.
@btsabc
Copy link

btsabc commented Jun 6, 2018

__int128I isn't supported in vc

@ryanRfox ryanRfox added 1c Task Task for team member to perform. Description may contain a Task List and reference child Sub-Tasks 2a Discussion Needed Prompt for team to discuss at next stand up. 3c Enhancement Classification indicating a change to the functionality of the existing imlementation 4a Low Priority Priority indicating minimal impact to system/user -OR- an inexpensive workaround exists 6 Protocol Impact flag identifying the blockchain logic, consensus, validation, etc. 6 Security Impact flag identifying system/user security labels Jun 6, 2018
@abitmore abitmore mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2018
Closed
@pmconrad pmconrad self-assigned this Jun 7, 2019
@pmconrad pmconrad added 2d Developing Status indicating currently designing and developing a solution and removed 2a Discussion Needed Prompt for team to discuss at next stand up. labels Jun 7, 2019
@pmconrad pmconrad added this to the 3.2.0 - Feature Release milestone Jun 7, 2019
@pmconrad
Copy link
Contributor

pmconrad commented Jun 7, 2019

__int128I isn't supported in vc

Will use it where available and fall back to boost::multiprecision otherwise

This was referenced Jun 9, 2019
Merged
Merged
@pmconrad pmconrad mentioned this issue Jun 20, 2019
Closed
@MichelSantos MichelSantos mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2019
Closed
@pmconrad
Copy link
Contributor

Merged with #1789

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pmconrad pmconrad

Labels
1c Task Task for team member to perform. Description may contain a Task List and reference child Sub-Tasks 2d Developing Status indicating currently designing and developing a solution 3c Enhancement Classification indicating a change to the functionality of the existing imlementation 4a Low Priority Priority indicating minimal impact to system/user -OR- an inexpensive workaround exists 6 Protocol Impact flag identifying the blockchain logic, consensus, validation, etc. 6 Security Impact flag identifying system/user security
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.3.0 - Feature Release
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@pmconrad @abitmore @ryanRfox @btsabc