Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

React & Flux #3

Closed
moimikey opened this issue Apr 3, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

React & Flux #3

moimikey opened this issue Apr 3, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@moimikey
Copy link
Member

moimikey commented Apr 3, 2015

I currently work at ShopKeep in downtown manhattan (across the street from Adafruit actually), and we recently had a long battled outcome of using React to re-develop our BackOffice (what ShopKeep customers use to administer their accounts). We're still deciding on what implementation of Flux to use, but so far we're strong proponents of using Marty.

@alexburgos
Copy link

@moimikey I actually wanted to try out Delorean http://deloreanjs.com/
Great name too!

@moimikey
Copy link
Member Author

moimikey commented Apr 3, 2015

Love the name also :) i've been doing multiple passes at https://github.com/voronianski/flux-comparison

@ml242
Copy link

ml242 commented Feb 17, 2016

Hi Michael! So what did you pick? Do you think you would have done anything differently with the new crop of Flux Capacitors?

@moimikey
Copy link
Member Author

@ml242 hi Matt :). Welp, a good almost year later, the front runner seems to be Redux. I have been starting to have interest in Cycle.js too.

@moimikey
Copy link
Member Author

at ShopKeep however, we ended up using FluxThis—not my first choice—which I think some of the team had eventually regretted.

@ml242
Copy link

ml242 commented Feb 17, 2016

I'm also interested in seeing where Cycle goes. Ditching JSX for the simplified syntax seems like a real plus. You're still stuck with picking a flux-ish store library to track component states though I think. Never heard of FluxThis....

Even on small apps this can turn into a real drag.

@ml242
Copy link

ml242 commented Feb 17, 2016

btw, your portfolio site doesn't suck

heh heh heh heh heh heh heh

@moimikey
Copy link
Member Author

ditching the JSX is all good. i agree. Interestingly, if you wanted to still use JSX, you can still do that with cycle. You can reuse the babel transform for jsx. I tried it and it worked perfectly. With cycle, it works similarly to redux. It can have a single source of truth and pass down props (but in cycle they're just called attributes). the single source of truth can just be one big immutable object.

why thank you :). i tried to make it colorful.

@moimikey
Copy link
Member Author

this was also an interesting thread on the argument between up-down vs down-up state: cyclejs/cyclejs#191

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants