-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#4270 - SFAS Bridge File - Expand Individual and Application data Import #4316
#4270 - SFAS Bridge File - Expand Individual and Application data Import #4316
Conversation
get applicationNumber(): number | null { | ||
return parseInteger(this.line.substring(145, 155)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not a blocker, no need to change it, but I have seen the two formats of executing the substring along the files (not this one is specific), 145, 155
vs 127, 127 + 10
. I personally prefer the first one but I do not have a strong opinion other than "we should do it in the same way" 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also saw the 2 formats there. I too prefer the format WITHOUT explicit addition. The existing individual record parser does not have the format with addition and I thought we could agree this way and move forward. I am also mindful about using the addition format for new record types in previous PR.
...packages/backend/libs/integrations/src/sfas-integration/sfas-files/sfas-individual-record.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...packages/backend/libs/integrations/src/sfas-integration/sfas-files/sfas-individual-record.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...packages/backend/libs/integrations/src/sfas-integration/sfas-files/sfas-individual-record.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work, minor comments, please take a look.
Just double-checking, is the expectation that once the new file layouts replace the existing ones, these new fields will always be present?
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making the changes, looks good 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple of Questions.
...ckend/libs/integrations/src/sfas-integration/sfas-files/sfas-application-dependant.record.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nd/libs/integrations/src/sfas-integration/sfas-files/sfas-application-disbursement.record.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM @dheepak-aot
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No comments. LGTM. Nice work 👍
SFAS Bridge File - Expand Individual and Application data Import
Import of extended data
SFAS Individual
andSFAS Application
.SFAS Individual
andSFAS Application
.SFAS Individuals
SFAS Applications
E2E Test
SFAS Individual
andSFAS Application
import.