-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Analysis - Ignore Restrictions #3662
Comments
Analysis Assumptions
Bypass behaviors
Proposed table structureName:
e-Cert Steps Changes
As @Joshua-Lakusta recommendation, the mentioned tickets #3028 and #3044 are no longer needed because #1862 and #1815 will satisfy the requirements. |
@Joshua-Lakusta a bypassed restriction should also be part of the logic that prevents the student from accepting an assessment? |
@Joshua-Lakusta a bypassed restriction still be listed in the application tracker cards? |
@Joshua-Lakusta currently we have the below possible actions associated with a restriction.
Should we assume the restrictions bypass will be applied only for |
@andrewsignori-aot a bypassed restriction should also be part of the logic that prevents the student from accepting an assessment? @andrewsignori-aot a bypassed restriction still be listed in the application tracker cards? @andrewsignori-aot currently we have the below possible actions associated with a restriction. No effect; As this is being handled as a manual ministry intervention we should allow them to bypass all restriction types that interfere with the assessment or disbursement. Stop full time BC funding is actually one that we specifically want this functionality for. If the restriction is bypassed we will need it to reassess. There is going to be further analysis around that one however, so we can postpone the issue of automatic reassessment of this one for the future.. At least allow it to be ignorable and if we need to reassess then we can manually force reassessment with the current manual reassess functionality we have now. |
@Joshua-Lakusta thanks for the reply all is clear but There are two scanrios for the Scenario Aa) The student does not have the Scenario Ba) The student already has a QuestionWhen the restriction is bypassed, should we completely ignore the verification of the
Josh Answers Scenario B: This described behavior is correct. |
@Joshua-Lakusta I adjusted the "View Modal" as below trying to follow the existing ones from the restrictions. Looks good! ~Josh |
@andrewsignori-aot added my answer into your comment on the two scenarios for Stop Full Time BC Funding. Look at the edit to the View Modal and it looks good overall. |
@Joshua-Lakusta based on the latest replies follow the questions. Related to "The resolve restriction should only be useable when the restriction currently exists.". |
@Joshua-Lakusta if a currently active student restriction is bypassed and later this restriction (federal or provincial) is marked as resolved, should we deactivate the bypass, or should we maybe display it in the list if the restriction is no longer active? Josh- |
@Joshua-Lakusta the scanrio is the below. In the above scenario, the history of bypassed restrictions will still display the no longer active student restriction in the history which can be misleading to the user. My recommendation would be to include the restriction status in the history to make it clear to the user and maybe have the button to "Remove the bypass" disabled. |
Moved this Note from Inside the ticket to comments ": Needs an epic to link all tickets @michesmith. " @ninosamson The epics are 2.2.3 Student View Restrictions and 4.5.6 Ministry Mange Student Restrictions and are now tagged |
Acceptance criteria
NOTE: There's also #3028 and #3044
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: