Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LSTM gradient check fails #5

Open
bayerj opened this issue May 31, 2009 · 1 comment
Open

LSTM gradient check fails #5

bayerj opened this issue May 31, 2009 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@bayerj
Copy link
Owner

bayerj commented May 31, 2009

And has to be corrected:

[ RUN      ] TestGradient.LstmLayer
New Parametrized instance.
Numeric/Analytical:-0 <-> 0
Numeric/Analytical:-0 <-> 0
Numeric/Analytical:-0 <-> 2.11224
Numeric/Analytical:-0 <-> 0
Expected: (0.001) > (gradient_check(*net_p, true)), actual: 0.001 vs 2.11224

However, the examples give the same solutions as PyBrain. Or?

@bayerj
Copy link
Owner Author

bayerj commented Jun 3, 2009

This is due to gradient_check not being able to handle sequential modules so far.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant