Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature request] VSCode-like inlay hints support #756

Closed
ClSlaid opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #759
Closed

[feature request] VSCode-like inlay hints support #756

ClSlaid opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #759
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lsp LSP related issues

Comments

@ClSlaid
Copy link
Contributor

ClSlaid commented May 22, 2023

expected:

showcase from twitter:
inlay-hints.jpg

===

merely hours ago, a new inline vitural text feature is merged into the main branch of neovim.

neovim/neovim#20130

It is said that with the support of:

https://github.com/theHamsta/nvim-dap-virtual-text/tree/inline-text

https://github.com/lvimuser/lsp-inlayhints.nvim/tree/anticonceal

we can get much better experience with this feature installed!

@ClSlaid ClSlaid changed the title VSCode-like inlay hints support [feature request] VSCode-like inlay hints support May 22, 2023
@ayamir ayamir added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2023
@ayamir
Copy link
Owner

ayamir commented May 22, 2023

Nice feature, but it need nightly build so a branch named 0.10 is required lol.

@ClSlaid
Copy link
Contributor Author

ClSlaid commented May 23, 2023

Nice feature, but it need nightly build so a branch named 0.10 is required lol.

Got a PR ready, please fork it.

@CharlesChiuGit
Copy link
Collaborator

CharlesChiuGit commented May 23, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lsp LSP related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants