Replies: 2 comments
-
second with u, and the reasons are the same. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
ok, I use the former just because it's the default option. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
So the way PRs are merged now is not the same. Basically we have three options: "Create a merge commit", "Squash and merge" and "Rebase and merge". Both @CharlesChiuGit and I chose "Squash and merge" and @ayamir chose "Create a merge commit".
FWIW we should unify the way of merging PRs. I tend to use "Squash and merge" b/c it can maintain linear commit history & make the commit tree more concise. What do you guys think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions