You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Question: would it make sense to provide an automatic mapping from strings to integers for categorical features (feat_static_cat)?
Currently GluonTS has the facility of bringing feat_static_cat, yet this has to be provided as sequential non-negative integers. On the other side, whereas the cardinality of these features is required as well, GluonTS is able to compute them automatically.
Since categorical features very often can be represented as strings, would it make sense to have the facility to automatically map categorical features from strings to integers?
In this way we would reduce the processing load of the user, and we would avoid the frequent issue of having non-sequential non-negative values in feat_static_cat
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Question: would it make sense to provide an automatic mapping from strings to integers for categorical features (feat_static_cat)?
Currently GluonTS has the facility of bringing
feat_static_cat
, yet this has to be provided as sequential non-negative integers. On the other side, whereas the cardinality of these features is required as well, GluonTS is able to compute them automatically.Since categorical features very often can be represented as strings, would it make sense to have the facility to automatically map categorical features from
strings
tointegers
?In this way we would reduce the processing load of the user, and we would avoid the frequent issue of having non-sequential non-negative values in
feat_static_cat
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions