-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
InterruptedException: sleep interrupted during KPL shutdown #34
Comments
Same problem here. Really annoying when running tests that requires frequent startup/shutdown. |
At a minimum, can the level of this log message be downgraded to something more appropriate, like DEBUG? It seems that it is a "normal" situation not worthy of a warning. |
This appears to be related to #10. We are looking at making the change, and will prioritize it with other customer requests. I can see some users have already posted reactions, can everyone else who's interested post reactions to assist us in prioritizing the change. Thanks |
Any idea when this will make it into a release? |
I'm on 0.12.8. This is still happening. Seems like an incorrect shutdown of an executor service, or the catch of the InterruptedExeception is not re-setting Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); to indicate to the executor that the thread is being destroyed. |
This was fixed in 0.12.9.
|
Confirmed. With 0.12.9, the error on shutdown is fixed. (Sorry, I should have read the notes on the "closed" comment of this thread). |
We have noticed that in out CI and sometimes even in PROD we see InterruptedException being logged by KPL during shutdown:
As I understand that is because we use updateCredentials which sleeps for a number of milliseconds before trying to update credentials. And during shutdown this InterruptedException is raised.
It is not an error but it does pollute logs with stack traces which gets especially noisy in CI.
I have raised a PR to fix that issue by not logging an InterruptedException during normal shutdown process.
Can we please get some attention to this PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: