-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tagging resource type coverage #228
Comments
Hi @PatMyron, I don't see AWS::Glue::Crawler in the above list, which I know suffers the same issue (stack-level tags dont get applied). Also suspect AWS::Glue::Workflow and AWS::Glue::Trigger may have the same, but would need to test. Do you want me to create an issue for these? |
As support is added for CloudFormation to add its automatic tags to more resource types, there should be a way to get those tags added to existing resources in a stack without providing a changed template. |
But it should be aware of resources that require some interruption or replacement when adding them. Eg. EIP or ElasticBeanstalk Environment |
@PatMyron I see the stack level tags not being applied to AWS::EC2::VPCEndpointService as well, do you want me to create an issue for this? |
@PatMyron can you update us if there is any progress being made here? |
@PatMyron Is this really in progress or is more of a low priority issue? |
@benkehoe does your comment covers the fact that explicitly adding This is not working for an existing distribution: Distribution:
Type: AWS::CloudFront::Distribution
Properties:
Tags:
- Key: my-tag-key
Value: my-tag-value By the way.. any workaround? |
Please add AWS EMRCluster to this list, CFN stack-level tags are not created. Thank you CloudFormation automatically creates the following stack-level tags with the prefix aws:: aws:cloudformation:logical-id |
#1734 :Add support for stack level tags to AWS::EC2::KeyPair |
Should be able to tag-on-create and update tags at the system tag-level, stack-level and resource-level for all resource types that support tagging natively without unnecessary resource replacement
#4, #7, #19, #28, #29, #64, #69, #74, #77, #84, #95, #96, #117, #133, #155, #176, #178, #184, #193, #194, #195, #196, #200, #202, #203, #205, #219, #231, #236, #238, #248, #277, #306, #309, #328, #340, #350, #354, #358, #394, #398
Wonder if tagging should be an issue label..
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: