Default reporter

[sindresorhus]

I think the default reporter should be super minimal one. It should only log out detailed test info if a test fails, otherwise just 1 test passed.

It could have a live counter, so while tests are running the line is dynamically updated with 3/12 tests passed, and when done rewritten to be 12 tests passed. That way it can be live, but also minimal.

Can use log-update.

[SamVerschueren]

Agree on this one, but should be implemented after #27 I guess. If people want the full blown output, they can then enable another reporter.

[vadimdemedes]

Yeah, reporters are an important feature to implement. But I think we're not "there" yet, there are some issues that have a much higher priority.

But once those are resolved, I am 100% on board with implementing custom reporters.

[vadimdemedes]

@sindresorhus do you still want to work on this? I'd like to assign this to myself :)

[sindresorhus]

Go ahead ;)

[alubbe]

Just some quick feedback from an early user that it would be awesome to have custom reporters :)

[sindresorhus]

@alubbe That will come when we add TAP support #27. You can then use any TAP-reporter.

[alubbe]

Awesome, I just hope that the concurrency doesn't end up posing a problem for TAP.

[jamestalmage]

We likely will have to buffer and output one whole test at a time.

[vadimdemedes]

What do you think about this?

[sindresorhus]

@vdemedes ❤️ Exactly what I was thinking.

[jamestalmage]

👍

[SamVerschueren]

👍

[ariporad]

👍