Skip to content

Conversation

@austinderek
Copy link
Owner

A few months ago, this was fixed for Turbopack. Adding a regression test now


🔄 This is a mirror of upstream PR #82471

@staging
Copy link

staging bot commented Aug 8, 2025

✅ This pull request was succesfully scanned and it was determined that it does not contain any changes that present immediate security concerns. If you would still like for it to be reviewed by an expert from our reviewer community, you can submit it manually via the HackerOne PullRequest dashboard.

⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit 5dbb65f (latest)

@staging
Copy link

staging bot commented Aug 8, 2025

✅ This pull request was succesfully scanned and it was determined that it does not contain any changes that present immediate security concerns. If you would still like for it to be reviewed by an expert from our reviewer community, you can submit it manually via the HackerOne PullRequest dashboard.

⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit 2e7bddb (latest)

@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the mischnic/no-server-css-chunks branch from 2e7bddb to a6c1e24 Compare August 8, 2025 15:30
@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the canary branch 4 times, most recently from 24d7fcc to e590df4 Compare August 8, 2025 17:20
@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the mischnic/no-server-css-chunks branch from a6c1e24 to fc1aa24 Compare August 8, 2025 17:22
@staging
Copy link

staging bot commented Aug 8, 2025

✅ This pull request was succesfully scanned and it was determined that it does not contain any changes that present immediate security concerns. If you would still like for it to be reviewed by an expert from our reviewer community, you can submit it manually via the HackerOne PullRequest dashboard.

⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit fc1aa24 (latest)

@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the canary branch 15 times, most recently from 24d7fcc to 09227b5 Compare August 9, 2025 03:23
@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the canary branch 21 times, most recently from 24d7fcc to 63cdc65 Compare August 10, 2025 04:06
@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the mischnic/no-server-css-chunks branch from 7ed3bd2 to dd8cf84 Compare August 11, 2025 08:38
@staging
Copy link

staging bot commented Aug 11, 2025

✅ This pull request was succesfully scanned and it was determined that it does not contain any changes that present immediate security concerns. If you would still like for it to be reviewed by an expert from our reviewer community, you can submit it manually via the HackerOne PullRequest dashboard.

⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit dd8cf84 (latest)

@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the mischnic/no-server-css-chunks branch from dd8cf84 to 6cb9fa9 Compare August 11, 2025 15:31
@staging
Copy link

staging bot commented Aug 11, 2025

✅ This pull request was succesfully scanned and it was determined that it does not contain any changes that present immediate security concerns. If you would still like for it to be reviewed by an expert from our reviewer community, you can submit it manually via the HackerOne PullRequest dashboard.

⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit 6cb9fa9 (latest)

@austinderek austinderek force-pushed the mischnic/no-server-css-chunks branch from 6cb9fa9 to 796c2be Compare August 11, 2025 20:28
@staging
Copy link

staging bot commented Aug 11, 2025

✅ This pull request was succesfully scanned and it was determined that it does not contain any changes that present immediate security concerns. If you would still like for it to be reviewed by an expert from our reviewer community, you can submit it manually via the HackerOne PullRequest dashboard.

⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit 796c2be (latest)

@austinderek austinderek deleted the mischnic/no-server-css-chunks branch August 11, 2025 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants