Skip to content

Conversation

@bandantonio
Copy link
Collaborator

@bandantonio bandantonio commented Nov 19, 2024

Description

  • Made doc sections more consistent
  • Replace duplicated styling in mermaid diagram with classes
  • Update yaml examples to use consistent formatting and descriptions

Related issue(s)
Fixes #3410
See also #3375

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Restructured and clarified the "Tags" document in AsyncAPI for improved readability.
    • Simplified definitions and enhanced explanations of the tags object and its properties.
    • Expanded usage section for tags at the info level to clarify their categorization role.
    • Updated examples and visual representations for consistency and readability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request revises the AsyncAPI "Tags" documentation by simplifying definitions, restructuring explanations of the tags object and its properties, clarifying tag usage at different levels, and improving formatting and examples for consistency and readability without altering core concepts.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
AsyncAPI Tags Documentation
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md
Simplified and clarified definitions; restructured content on tags object and usage; improved formatting of examples and diagrams; enhanced logical flow and consistency across sections.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve writing style in AsyncAPI documentation (#3410)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes identified.

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • sambhavgupta0705
  • quetzalliwrites
  • devilkiller-ag
  • BhaswatiRoy
  • J0SAL
  • VaishnaviNandakumar

🐇 In the land of tags, where clarity reigns,
A rabbit hops forth, with joy in its veins.
With words now so clear, and examples so bright,
The AsyncAPI shines, a true guiding light!
Let's gather our tags, in harmony's dance,
For structure and flow, give clarity a chance! 🌟

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 87b9b2d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/asyncapi-website/deploys/6891e7b1d143b60008ce3ebb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3411--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c166eaa) to head (87b9b2d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3411   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           22        22           
  Lines          778       778           
  Branches       144       144           
=========================================
  Hits           778       778           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Nov 19, 2024

⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔴 Performance 37
🟢 Accessibility 98
🟢 Best practices 92
🟢 SEO 100
🔴 PWA 33

Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3411--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (4)

14-14: Consider using "brief" instead of "short".

To strengthen the writing style, consider replacing "short" with "brief" in the description property definition.

-- `description`: A short description explaining the tag's purpose or usage.
++ `description`: A brief description explaining the tag's purpose or usage.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e: The name of the tag. - description`: A short description explaining the tag'...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~14-~14: Consider using the synonym “brief” (= concise, using a few words, not lasting long) to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...The name of the tag. - description: A short description explaining the tag's purpos...

(QUICK_BRIEF)


66-67: Improve bullet point consistency.

The bullet points have inconsistent formatting. Consider making them parallel in structure.

-- criteria like location, environment type (like production or development), and unique server features.
-- specific tags or labels.
++ Location, environment type (production/development), and unique server features
++ Specific tags and labels for server identification

Line range hint 239-254: Fix YAML indentation.

The YAML example needs consistent indentation for better readability.

-name: SimpleSignup
-summary: A simple UserSignup example message
-tags: 
-    - name: userSignUp
-      description: some message related to user signup
-headers:
-  correlationId: my-correlation-id
-  applicationInstanceId: myInstanceId
-payload:
-  user:
-    someUserKey: someUserValue
-  signup:
-    someSignupKey: someSignupValue
+name: SimpleSignup
+summary: A simple UserSignup example message
+tags: 
+  - name: userSignUp
+    description: some message related to user signup
+headers:
+  correlationId: my-correlation-id
+  applicationInstanceId: myInstanceId
+payload:
+  user:
+    someUserKey: someUserValue
+  signup:
+    someSignupKey: someSignupValue

338-338: Remove unused link reference.

The link reference [components-field] is not used in the document.

-[components-field]: /docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/structure#components-field
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

338-338: Unused link or image reference definition: "components-field"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed

(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6b0573 and ec142f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (14 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md

[uncategorized] ~13-~13: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ains the following properties: - name: The name of the tag. - description: A...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e: The name of the tag. - description`: A short description explaining the tag'...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~14-~14: Consider using the synonym “brief” (= concise, using a few words, not lasting long) to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...The name of the tag. - description: A short description explaining the tag's purpos...

(QUICK_BRIEF)


[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...tag's purpose or usage. - externalDocs: Additional external documentation for t...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 Markdownlint
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md

338-338: Unused link or image reference definition: "components-field"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed

(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (3)

Line range hint 22-60: LGTM! Clear explanation with consistent styling.

The section effectively explains tags in the info object context, with well-structured visual representation and practical examples.


Line range hint 116-164: LGTM! Well-structured explanation with clear examples.

The section effectively explains channel tags with appropriate visual aids and examples.


Line range hint 165-216: LGTM! Comprehensive coverage of operations tags.

The section provides a thorough explanation with well-structured examples and diagrams.

@sambhavgupta0705
Copy link
Member

/update

@sambhavgupta0705 sambhavgupta0705 added 📑 docs area/docs Specify what technical area given issue relates to. Its goal is to ease filtering good first issues. labels Dec 30, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this pull request, add a comment with detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific pull request has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this pull request forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 30, 2025
@bandantonio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not stale, still waiting for review.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label May 1, 2025
@TRohit20 TRohit20 self-requested a review as a code owner May 5, 2025 06:52
- Made doc sections more consistent
- Replace duplicated styling in mermaid diagram with classes
- Update yaml examples to use consistent formatting and descriptions
@bandantonio bandantonio force-pushed the docs/tags-doc-improve-writing-style branch from aac3385 to 9e2919b Compare May 7, 2025 19:52
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (11)

7-11: Unify introductory definitions for clarity
The opening sentences on lines 7, 9, and 11 repeat similar context. Consider consolidating into a single, concise introduction, for example:
“The tags field is an array of [tag objects][tag-object] defined under the info object. Each tag has these properties:”
This avoids redundancy and makes the doc even more direct.


14-14: Prefer “brief” over “short” for conciseness
To strengthen the wording, replace “A short description explaining…” with “A brief description explaining…”.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e: The name of the tag. - description`: A short description explaining the tag'...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~14-~14: Consider using the synonym “brief” (= concise, using a few words, not lasting long) to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...The name of the tag. - description: A short description explaining the tag's purpos...

(QUICK_BRIEF)


17-19: Split into two sentences and use active voice
Line 17–19 is a long compound sentence. For readability, break it up and use active constructions, e.g.:
“Tags serve two main purposes. You can define global tags under info for document-wide grouping, or apply tags directly to components (servers, channels, operations) for more targeted categorization.”


22-22: Shorten phrasing to improve flow
On line 22, consider trimming “specified in the tags property of the info object categorize the entire AsyncAPI document” to
“Tags under info categorize the document by functional area.”


49-49: Consolidate multi-line description into one sentence
The YAML example’s description block is split over two lines without final punctuation. Consider combining into a single sentence with a period:

description: "This AsyncAPI document provides an overview of the event-driven system."

This ensures grammatical completeness.

Also applies to: 275-275


52-52: Enforce hyphenation for compound modifiers
In example descriptions, use hyphens consistently:

  • application-related topics
  • time-related topics
  • speech-related topics
  • video-related topics
    This prevents ambiguity in compound adjectives.

Also applies to: 57-57, 265-265, 268-268


64-67: Consistent bullet list punctuation
Under “tags in servers,” bullets 66 and 67 end with periods, but some lists elsewhere don’t. Either add periods to all or remove them for consistency.


69-69: Unify “optional” phrasing across sections
Each component section notes optional usage differently. Recommend a single pattern, e.g.:
“Applying tags at the <component> level is optional.”
This consistent phrasing improves scan-ability.

Also applies to: 118-118, 167-167, 219-219


99-99: Refine example descriptions for clarity
Standardize the environment descriptions in servers:

  • “development AMQP broker” → “AMQP broker for development”
  • “This environment is meant for developers to run their tests” → “AMQP broker used for development testing”
  • “RabbitMQ broker for the production environment” → “AMQP broker for production”
  • “live environment available for final users” → “production broker available to end users”
  • “RabbitMQ broker for sending speech data” → “AMQP broker for speech data”
  • “RabbitMQ broker for video information” → “AMQP broker for video data”
    This tightens wording and aligns style.

Also applies to: 103-104, 107-107, 111-112, 283-283, 289-289


198-198: Use imperative present tense in summaries
On line 198, change

summary: Action to sign a user up

to

summary: Sign up a user

This matches conventional summary style in AsyncAPI examples.


256-256: Break long sentences for readability
Line 256 is a lengthy lead-in. Consider splitting:
“Below is an example of tags defined under components. The tags are then referenced in servers and channels.”
This makes it easier to digest.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec142f3 and 9e2919b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (14 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md

[uncategorized] ~13-~13: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ains the following properties: - name: The name of the tag. - description: A...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e: The name of the tag. - description`: A short description explaining the tag'...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~14-~14: Consider using the synonym “brief” (= concise, using a few words, not lasting long) to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...The name of the tag. - description: A short description explaining the tag's purpos...

(QUICK_BRIEF)


[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...tag's purpose or usage. - externalDocs: Additional external documentation for t...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md

338-338: Link and image reference definitions should be needed
Unused link or image reference definition: "components-field"

(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - macos-13

Comment on lines +36 to +37
class B,F,I,K,G cyanColor;
classDef cyanColor fill:#47BCEE,stroke:#000;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

DRY up repeated Mermaid styling
Each diagram repeats the same classDef blocks. Extract the shared class definitions into a single include or partial (e.g., _includes/mermaid‐styles.md) and reference it in each block to avoid duplication.

Also applies to: 83-84, 139-140, 188-189, 234-235

@thulieblack thulieblack self-requested a review as a code owner July 24, 2025 12:39
@thulieblack thulieblack changed the title docs(tags): improve writing style docs improve writing style for tags Jul 24, 2025
@thulieblack thulieblack changed the title docs improve writing style for tags docs: improve writing style for tags Jul 24, 2025
tags:
- $ref: '#/components/tags/video'
```

Copy link
Member

@thulieblack thulieblack Jul 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This whole section is not rendering correctly on the website.

image image

@sambhavgupta0705
Copy link
Member

@bandantonio any update?

@bandantonio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sambhavgupta0705 will update the PR today, didn't spot the issue immediately

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (1)

240-254: YAML snippet is invalid due to leading spaces and inconsistent indentation

Extra leading spaces on lines 241–243 shift the root level and break parsing. Suggested fix:

- name: SimpleSignup
-summary: A simple UserSignup example message
-tags: 
-    - name: userSignUp
-      description: some message related to user signup
+name: SimpleSignup
+summary: A simple UserSignup example message
+tags:
+  - name: userSignUp
+    description: Some message related to user signup

Without correct indentation, readers cannot copy-paste and validate the example.

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (1)

36-38: Mermaid styling duplication still present

The identical classDef cyanColor and repeated class … cyanColor; blocks re-appear in every diagram. Please extract the style into a shared include to keep the markdown DRY (see earlier comment).

Also applies to: 83-85, 139-141, 188-190, 234-236

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (3)

11-16: Clarify that the listed properties belong to each tag object, not the tags field itself

The current wording (“The individual tags field contains the following properties”) might mislead readers into thinking the tags array itself holds these keys. In reality, each tag object inside that array carries them.

-The individual `tags` field contains the following properties:
+Each tag object in the `tags` array can contain the following properties:

17-20: Tighten the “either … or” sentence to remove the extra and

The conjunction sequence breaks the either/or construction and reads awkwardly.

-Tags have different purposes depending on the context. They can either be used for consistent tag usage across the AsyncAPI document and logical component grouping or be applied to individual components like ...
+Tags serve two purposes: (1) consistent, document-wide grouping, or (2) targeted labelling of individual components such as ...

64-68: Bullet list mixes structure & example; split for clarity

The first bullet sets high-level criteria, the second repeats “specific tags or labels”, which is essentially the same idea. Consider merging or rewriting to avoid redundancy.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e2919b and 0230e9d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (13 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: asyncapi-bot
PR: asyncapi/website#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T12:07:42.211Z
Learning: The following PR commands are supported in the asyncapi/website repository:
- `/please-take-a-look` or `/ptal`: Requests attention from reviewers who haven't reviewed the PR
- `/ready-to-merge` or `/rtm`: Triggers automerge when all conditions are met
- `/do-not-merge` or `/dnm`: Blocks automerge even if all conditions are met
- `/autoupdate` or `/au`: Adds autoupdate label to keep PR in sync with target branch
- `/update` or `/u`: One-time update of PR with latest changes from target branch
Learnt from: akshatnema
PR: asyncapi/website#3378
File: scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js:1-1
Timestamp: 2024-11-25T18:34:51.303Z
Learning: When reviewing `scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js`, optimizations should be addressed in separate issues and not included in the current pull request.
Learnt from: bandantonio
PR: asyncapi/website#4264
File: markdown/docs/tutorials/getting-started/coming-from-openapi.md:24-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T20:58:34.040Z
Learning: In the AsyncAPI website documentation, anchor references to specification sections can use camelCase format (e.g., #serverObject, #parameterObject, #messageObject) even if the actual HTML IDs on the spec page use hyphenated lowercase format. This is acceptable and should not be changed.
Learnt from: anshgoyalevil
PR: asyncapi/website#3557
File: tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.js:3-11
Timestamp: 2025-01-19T04:51:41.255Z
Learning: In the AsyncAPI website repository, the test data in `tests/fixtures/markdown/check-edit-links-data.js` intentionally includes inconsistent paths (with and without 'docs' prefix) to verify the script's ability to normalize and handle ambiguous path structures.
Learnt from: akshatnema
PR: asyncapi/website#3265
File: tests/fixtures/toolsObjectData.js:51-52
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T17:35:36.557Z
Learning: When reviewing code in the 'asyncapi/website' repository, akshatnema prefers that I do not provide committable code suggestions.
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md (6)

Learnt from: bandantonio
PR: #4264
File: markdown/docs/tutorials/getting-started/coming-from-openapi.md:24-25
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T20:58:34.040Z
Learning: In the AsyncAPI website documentation, anchor references to specification sections can use camelCase format (e.g., #serverObject, #parameterObject, #messageObject) even if the actual HTML IDs on the spec page use hyphenated lowercase format. This is acceptable and should not be changed.

Learnt from: akshatnema
PR: #3262
File: components/navigation/BlogPostItem.tsx:80-87
Timestamp: 2024-10-11T11:17:32.246Z
Learning: In the BlogPostItem component, the parent Link wraps the entire content, so inner Link components around the title and excerpt are unnecessary.

Learnt from: akshatnema
PR: #3262
File: components/navigation/BlogPostItem.tsx:95-119
Timestamp: 2024-10-11T11:32:30.226Z
Learning: In the BlogPostItem component (components/navigation/BlogPostItem.tsx), nesting <a> tags inside the parent Link component leads to hydration issues; therefore, we should avoid nesting <a> tags inside Link components in this component.

Learnt from: akshatnema
PR: #3378
File: scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js:1-1
Timestamp: 2024-11-25T18:34:51.303Z
Learning: When reviewing scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js, optimizations should be addressed in separate issues and not included in the current pull request.

Learnt from: anshgoyalevil
PR: #3301
File: scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-18T17:24:45.053Z
Learning: In scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js, the script is not run in an asynchronous environment, so refactoring it to use async/await is unnecessary.

Learnt from: TRohit20
PR: #4107
File: markdown/docs/tools/studio/architecture.md:23-23
Timestamp: 2025-05-09T17:35:57.171Z
Learning: In the AsyncAPI Studio architecture documentation, "Layer Breakdown" is intentionally structured as an H3 heading (subsection) because it provides additional detail about the layered architecture pattern introduced earlier, rather than being a standalone main section.

🪛 LanguageTool
markdown/docs/concepts/asyncapi-document/tags.md

[style] ~14-~14: Consider using the synonym “brief” (= concise, using a few words, not lasting long) to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...The name of the tag. - description: A short description explaining the tag's purpos...

(QUICK_BRIEF)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 180000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test NodeJS PR - windows-latest

@sambhavgupta0705
Copy link
Member

@bandantonio any update

@bandantonio
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sambhavgupta0705 All done in 0230e9d

@thulieblack
Copy link
Member

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit bc0eeff into asyncapi:master Aug 5, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/docs Specify what technical area given issue relates to. Its goal is to ease filtering good first issues. 📑 docs ready-to-merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[📑 Docs]: Concepts/AsyncAPI Document/Tags: Improve writing style

4 participants