Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove AsciidoctorUtils class #1169

Closed
abelsromero opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1170
Closed

Remove AsciidoctorUtils class #1169

abelsromero opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1170
Milestone

Comments

@abelsromero
Copy link
Member

Based on recent personal experience and the conversation, there seems to be a sentiment that this class is not useful, given it's used for logging and 1 test.

While the class is public it is in internal package. If anyone is using it, it should not come as a surprise.
Also, I am advocating removing it in v3.0.0 only, no need to add extra work for 2.5.x.

@abelsromero abelsromero added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Apr 7, 2023
abelsromero added a commit to abelsromero/asciidoctorj that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2023
This class contained a method to convert options into asciidoctor cli.
Used only for logging and tests it's considered not useful.

Other changes:
* Add AssertJ dependency to Java projects by default
* Refactored AsciidoctorUtils.isOptionWithAttribute into JRubyAsciidoctor.containsAttributeWithValue

Fixes asciidoctor#1169
abelsromero added a commit to abelsromero/asciidoctorj that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2023
This class contained a method to convert options into asciidoctor cli.
Used only for logging and tests it's considered not useful.

Other changes:
* Add AssertJ dependency to Java projects by default
* Refactored AsciidoctorUtils.isOptionWithAttribute into JRubyAsciidoctor.containsAttributeWithValue

Fixes asciidoctor#1169
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant