Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Support oci-based helm repository #4018

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 27, 2020
Merged

feat: Support oci-based helm repository #4018

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 27, 2020

Conversation

haoshuwei
Copy link
Contributor

features for proposal #3349
Signed-off-by: haoshuwei [email protected]

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this does not need to be in the release notes.
  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • I've updated both the CLI and UI to expose my feature, or I plan to submit a second PR with them.
  • Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.
  • I've signed the CLA and my build is green (troubleshooting builds).

@haoshuwei haoshuwei changed the title feat:support oci-based helm repository feat: support oci-based helm repository Jul 29, 2020
@haoshuwei haoshuwei changed the title feat: support oci-based helm repository feat: Support oci-based helm repository Jul 29, 2020
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 3, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #4018 into master will decrease coverage by 0.24%.
The diff coverage is 18.35%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4018      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.89%   42.65%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       18255    18386     +131     
==========================================
+ Hits         7831     7842      +11     
- Misses       9423     9534     +111     
- Partials     1001     1010       +9     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cmd/argocd/commands/app.go 5.50% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
cmd/argocd/commands/repo.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/apis/application/v1alpha1/types.go 58.73% <0.00%> (-0.37%) ⬇️
util/settings/settings.go 42.26% <ø> (ø)
util/helm/cmd.go 28.12% <10.38%> (-13.94%) ⬇️
util/argo/argo.go 73.12% <25.00%> (-1.44%) ⬇️
util/helm/client.go 48.48% <28.26%> (-10.58%) ⬇️
reposerver/repository/repository.go 59.90% <50.00%> (ø)
server/application/application.go 29.47% <100.00%> (ø)
util/db/repository.go 65.78% <100.00%> (+0.22%) ⬆️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 997f38d...593a9e0. Read the comment docs.

@haoshuwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @jannfis,can you help have a review about this PR, proposal: Support to use Helm 3 with OCI for package distribution

@xianlubird
Copy link
Member

@jessesuen Pls take a look.

jannfis
jannfis previously requested changes Aug 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jannfis jannfis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @haoshuwei, thanks a lot for your PR - I have made a first review, please find my comments below.

cmd/argocd/commands/repo.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/argocd/commands/repo.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/argo/argo.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/cmd.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/cmd.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/cmd.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/cmd.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/cmd.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
util/helm/cmd.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/argocd/commands/repo.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/apis/application/v1alpha1/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@haoshuwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexmt @jannfis I have updated the PR to use --enable-oci instead of a new type helm-oci. Please help have a refresh review, thanks.

@haoshuwei haoshuwei requested review from alexmt and jannfis August 17, 2020 03:34
@haoshuwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexmt can you please help have a look at this PR?

@SayakMukhopadhyay
Copy link
Contributor

SayakMukhopadhyay commented Sep 1, 2020

@alexmt @jannfis I have updated the PR to use --enable-oci instead of a new type helm-oci. Please help have a refresh review, thanks.

Would enabling the feature still support older helm repos? If it does, does the controller figure out if the target repo is a OCI repo or not?

@jannfis jannfis added this to the v1.8 milestone Sep 8, 2020
Name string `protobuf:"bytes,10,opt,name=name,proto3" json:"name,omitempty"`
Name string `protobuf:"bytes,10,opt,name=name,proto3" json:"name,omitempty"`
// Whether helm-oci support should be enabled for this repo
EnableOci bool `protobuf:"varint,11,opt,name=enableOci,proto3" json:"enableOci,omitempty"`
Copy link
Contributor

@wtam2018 wtam2018 Sep 9, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

golang coding standard sugguests that acronyms to have a consistent case. For example, EnableOci should be EnabledOCI. See
https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#initialisms
And, I would probably use OCIEnabled as the name of a bool field.

@alexmt
Copy link
Collaborator

alexmt commented Sep 18, 2020

Sorry for delay @haoshuwei . Looking at PR ASAP

Copy link
Collaborator

@alexmt alexmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for delay again. Added a couple of minor comments. Looks like it is almost ready to merge. Thank you @haoshuwei !

@@ -122,6 +123,9 @@ func NewApplicationCreateCommand(clientOpts *argocdclient.ClientOptions) *cobra.
# Create a Helm app from a Helm repo
argocd app create nginx-ingress --repo https://kubernetes-charts.storage.googleapis.com --helm-chart nginx-ingress --revision 1.24.3 --dest-namespace default --dest-server https://kubernetes.default.svc

# Create a Helm app from a Helm OCI-based repo
argocd app create nginx-ingress --repo helm-oci-registry.cn-zhangjiakou.cr.aliyuncs.com --helm-chart acs/nginx-ingress --revision 1.24.3 --dest-namespace default --dest-server https://kubernetes.default.svc
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I stuck here for a couple of minutes trying to find the difference with non-oci repository :) . There is difference, right ? In this can we remove this line ?

@@ -106,7 +110,9 @@ func (c *nativeHelmChart) ExtractChart(chart string, version *semver.Version) (s
}
if !exists {
// always use Helm V3 since we don't have chart content to determine correct Helm version
helmCmd, err := NewCmdWithVersion(c.repoPath, HelmV3)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: is helmCmd := &Cmd{} required. Can you please use helmCmd, err := NewCmdWithVersion(c.repoPath, HelmV3, c.enableOci)?

args = append(args, "--key-file", filePath)
}

return c.run(args...)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add --insecure flag is creds.InsecureSkipVerify is set to true.

args := []string{"registry", "logout"}
args = append(args, repo)

if creds.CAPath != "" {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add --insecure flag is creds.InsecureSkipVerify is set to true

@JrCs
Copy link

JrCs commented Oct 26, 2020

Any news ?

Copy link
Collaborator

@alexmt alexmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR contains great changes and implements a very useful feature. It would be a shame to waste the effort.

@haoshuwei implemented 99% of changes with only a few minors review comments. I took the liberty, resolved merged conflicts and reviewer comments in the fork. I hope you don't mind @haoshuwei .

LGTM :)

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #4018 into master will decrease coverage by 0.38%.
The diff coverage is 15.06%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4018      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.37%   40.98%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files         126      126              
  Lines       17154    17292     +138     
==========================================
- Hits         7097     7087      -10     
- Misses       9042     9185     +143     
- Partials     1015     1020       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cmd/argocd/commands/repo.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/apis/application/v1alpha1/types.go 57.92% <0.00%> (-0.37%) ⬇️
util/settings/settings.go 40.65% <ø> (ø)
util/argo/argo.go 59.32% <6.66%> (-5.37%) ⬇️
util/helm/cmd.go 25.69% <11.84%> (-13.44%) ⬇️
util/helm/client.go 45.03% <21.95%> (-11.01%) ⬇️
reposerver/repository/repository.go 60.94% <66.66%> (ø)
server/application/application.go 29.10% <100.00%> (ø)
util/db/repository.go 63.73% <100.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️
controller/appcontroller.go 50.56% <0.00%> (-1.92%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3bf9deb...e40d183. Read the comment docs.

@unittolabs unittolabs mentioned this pull request May 31, 2021
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants