Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

POW PowerDelta tresholds #2880

Closed
Lu-Fi opened this issue Jun 1, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

POW PowerDelta tresholds #2880

Lu-Fi opened this issue Jun 1, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
awaiting feedback Action - Waiting for response or more information question Type - Asking for Information

Comments

@Lu-Fi
Copy link

Lu-Fi commented Jun 1, 2018

Please add or use existing tresholds (eg. PowerHigh / PowerLow) for PowerDelta.
It's currently not really usable if Consumption is normaly ~0-5W.
Every minimal sensor difference will fire an MQTT Message.

@IVI053
Copy link

IVI053 commented Jul 7, 2018

I have the same problem. Only percentage for powerdelta with no limits has the problem that it fires to much on low values and to less on high.
So for high i can set teleperiod according to my demands but as the measurements are not too accurate you have noise when nothing draws power and 1W to 3W is already 200%. While that change is insignificant setting it to >200% to filter this out means at arround 100W already getting a too huge needed change IMHO.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 21, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Action - Issue left behind - Used by the BOT to call for attention label Aug 21, 2018
@IVI053
Copy link

IVI053 commented Aug 26, 2018

bump

@stale stale bot removed the stale Action - Issue left behind - Used by the BOT to call for attention label Aug 26, 2018
@ascillato
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

What about using rules to set exactly the energy report that fit your requirements like:

rule 1
rule 4
rule on Energy#Power>5 do publish stat/sonoff/energy %value% endon

@ascillato2 ascillato2 added awaiting feedback Action - Waiting for response or more information question Type - Asking for Information labels Aug 27, 2018
@ascillato2
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

Please, share your results when you have time. Thanks.

@IVI053
Copy link

IVI053 commented Sep 9, 2018

Wouldn't it flood mqtt with every change above 5 with this rule?

@ascillato
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, no because the rule is one-shot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting feedback Action - Waiting for response or more information question Type - Asking for Information
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants