RFC: rover docs go

[EverlastingBugstopper]

I think it would be super nice to let folks open the browser to go to important docs links right from Rover!

Proposed usage:

$ rover docs --help
rover-docs 0.0.1
Interact with Rover's documentation

USAGE:
    rover docs [OPTIONS] <SUBCOMMAND>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

OPTIONS:
    -l, --log <log-level>     [default: info]  [possible values: error, warn, info,
                             debug, trace]

SUBCOMMANDS:
    open       Opens a documentation page in your browser

$ rover docs open --help
rover-docs-open 0.0.1
Opens a documentation page in your browser

USAGE:
    rover docs open [OPTIONS] <doc>

FLAGS:
    -h, --help       Prints help information
    -V, --version    Prints version information

OPTIONS:
    -l, --log <log-level>            [default: info]  [possible values: error, warn, info,
                                    debug, trace]
        --profile <profile-name>    Name of configuration profile to use [default: default]

ARGS:
    <doc>    
             [default: docs]    [possible values: docs, start, api-keys, contributing]

$ rover docs open
Would you like to open https://go.apollo.dev/r/docs in your browser? [y/N]

[EverlastingBugstopper]

while i'm thinking about it, i wonder if we should be sending users to old docs if they have an old version. our docs solution allows us to tag individual versions of the docs and view them separately, i wonder if our go.apollo.dev redirects should take a version query parameter or something and link folks to the proper version instead of just latest.

[JakeDawkins]

Maybe instead of rover docs go, we could go rover docs open? I think I like that better

I was actually thinking about a command that we could add (I'll rfc separately), that'd open a graph/subgraph in studio, and I think rover graph open would sound more clear. If we had separate commands to open web browsers, I'd think their verbs should match

[EverlastingBugstopper]

I've updated the top level comment to be rover docs open - i think that sounds better too.