[MetaSchedule][Minor] Fix EvaluatorConfig Argument Description #11766
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zxybazh
changed the title
junrushao
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2022
Member
junrushao
left a comment
junrushao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Who did this amazing figure? We should really include that in our document!!!
blackkker
pushed a commit
to blackkker/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2022
…e#11766) Pointed out by @sunggg that the description of `number` and `repeat` for evaluator configuration is not accurate, updated to a version more consistent with `TimeEvaluator`. 
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pointed out by @sunggg that the description of
numberandrepeatfor evaluator configuration is not accurate, updated to a version more consistent withTimeEvaluator.