Skip to content

Conversation

@mgaido91
Copy link
Contributor

@mgaido91 mgaido91 commented Mar 5, 2018

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The PR adds interpreted execution to WrapOption.

How was this patch tested?

added UT

test("SPARK-23586: WrapOption should support interpreted execution") {
val cls = ObjectType(classOf[java.lang.Integer])
val inputObject = BoundReference(0, cls, nullable = true)
val unwrapObject = WrapOption(inputObject, cls)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT: unwrapObject?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no problem :)

Copy link
Contributor

@hvanhovell hvanhovell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - pending Jenkins. Can you also touch up the name in the test case?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 6, 2018

Test build #87976 has finished for PR 20741 at commit a67db05.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@hvanhovell
Copy link
Contributor

Merging to master. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in f6b49f9 Mar 6, 2018
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 6, 2018

Test build #87977 has finished for PR 20741 at commit 28e349e.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants