Commit 8ddbc43
[SPARK-20685] Fix BatchPythonEvaluation bug in case of single UDF w/ repeated arg.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There's a latent corner-case bug in PySpark UDF evaluation where executing a `BatchPythonEvaluation` with a single multi-argument UDF where _at least one argument value is repeated_ will crash at execution with a confusing error.
This problem was introduced in #12057: the code there has a fast path for handling a "batch UDF evaluation consisting of a single Python UDF", but that branch incorrectly assumes that a single UDF won't have repeated arguments and therefore skips the code for unpacking arguments from the input row (whose schema may not necessarily match the UDF inputs due to de-duplication of repeated arguments which occurred in the JVM before sending UDF inputs to Python).
This fix here is simply to remove this special-casing: it turns out that the code in the "multiple UDFs" branch just so happens to work for the single-UDF case because Python treats `(x)` as equivalent to `x`, not as a single-argument tuple.
## How was this patch tested?
New regression test in `pyspark.python.sql.tests` module (tested and confirmed that it fails before my fix).
Author: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>
Closes #17927 from JoshRosen/SPARK-20685.1 parent af8b6cc commit 8ddbc43
2 files changed
+19
-16
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
330 | 330 | | |
331 | 331 | | |
332 | 332 | | |
| 333 | + | |
| 334 | + | |
| 335 | + | |
| 336 | + | |
| 337 | + | |
| 338 | + | |
333 | 339 | | |
334 | 340 | | |
335 | 341 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
87 | 87 | | |
88 | 88 | | |
89 | 89 | | |
90 | | - | |
91 | | - | |
92 | | - | |
93 | | - | |
94 | | - | |
95 | | - | |
96 | | - | |
97 | | - | |
98 | | - | |
99 | | - | |
100 | | - | |
101 | | - | |
102 | | - | |
103 | | - | |
104 | | - | |
105 | | - | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
106 | 103 | | |
107 | 104 | | |
108 | 105 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments