-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
HIVE-28121. (2.3) Use direct SQL for transactional altering table parameter #5204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -608,6 +608,33 @@ public boolean openTransaction(String isolationLevel) { | |
| return result; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public long updateParameterWithExpectedValue(Table table, String key, String expectedValue, String newValue) | ||
| throws MetaException, NoSuchObjectException { | ||
| final Table _table = table; | ||
|
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this might be limitation of Java 7
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is ok |
||
| final String _key = key; | ||
| final String _expectedValue = expectedValue; | ||
| final String _newValue = newValue; | ||
| return new GetHelper<Long>(table.getDbName(), table.getTableName(), true, false) { | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| protected String describeResult() { | ||
| return "Affected rows"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| protected Long getSqlResult(GetHelper<Long> ctx) throws MetaException { | ||
| return directSql.updateTableParam(_table, _key, _expectedValue, _newValue); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| protected Long getJdoResult(GetHelper<Long> ctx) throws MetaException, NoSuchObjectException { | ||
| throw new UnsupportedOperationException( | ||
| "Cannot update parameter with JDO, make sure direct SQL is enabled"); | ||
| } | ||
| }.run(false); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * if this is the commit of the first open call then an actual commit is | ||
| * called. | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for reference, we hit performance issues in our production environment on executing this SQL. Changing the
INto=would solve this issue, at least for MySQL 5.7There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @pan3793 for reporting the issue. I agree it's better to use scalar subquery here. But since both 2.x and 3.x lines are EOL, and subquery is not used in 4.0, so I guess we won't have to do anything at the moment, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the Hive 4.0 doesn't have such an issue. This is just a tip for users who want to port this patch to their internal legacy Hive version (2.3 or 3.x)