You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There was a bug filed for a similar issue with BQ load jobs, #24535, that appears to still have an error path on Python SDK when copying the jobs from temporary tables to their final destination.
When using BigQueryIO Write with WRITE_TRUNCATE disposition, the first bundle is copied correctly, but the subsequent bundle does not set the disposition to WRITE_APPEND for itself and future bundles as intended. This leads to a "table exists" error thrown by BQ as the call to BQ tries to create a new table for the table already created by the first bundle.
Issue Priority
Priority: 1 (data loss / total loss of function)
Issue Components
Component: Python SDK
Component: Java SDK
Component: Go SDK
Component: Typescript SDK
Component: IO connector
Component: Beam examples
Component: Beam playground
Component: Beam katas
Component: Website
Component: Spark Runner
Component: Flink Runner
Component: Samza Runner
Component: Twister2 Runner
Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner
Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What happened?
There was a bug filed for a similar issue with BQ load jobs, #24535, that appears to still have an error path on Python SDK when copying the jobs from temporary tables to their final destination.
When using BigQueryIO Write with WRITE_TRUNCATE disposition, the first bundle is copied correctly, but the subsequent bundle does not set the disposition to WRITE_APPEND for itself and future bundles as intended. This leads to a "table exists" error thrown by BQ as the call to BQ tries to create a new table for the table already created by the first bundle.
Issue Priority
Priority: 1 (data loss / total loss of function)
Issue Components
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: