Skip to content

Conversation

@laurentgo
Copy link
Contributor

@laurentgo laurentgo commented Nov 3, 2023

Rationale for this change

joda is a very popular date/time manipulation library for java but the introduction of java.time package makes it obsolete and author actually recommends using java.time over joda

Note that from Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK which replaces this project.

What changes are included in this PR?

Change include the use of java.time classes over joda classes and the removal of joda library as a dependency

Are these changes tested?

As there is no behavior change, it is covered by the existing tests

…ibrary

Replace joda usage in flight-sql core library with `java.time` classes
@laurentgo laurentgo requested a review from lidavidm as a code owner November 3, 2023 22:41
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2023

⚠️ GitHub issue #38578 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Nov 6, 2023
@lidavidm lidavidm merged commit 02d8bd2 into apache:main Nov 6, 2023
@lidavidm lidavidm removed the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Nov 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Nov 6, 2023
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 02d8bd2.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…ibrary (apache#38579)

### Rationale for this change

[joda](https://www.joda.org/joda-time/) is a very popular date/time manipulation library for java but the introduction of `java.time` package makes it obsolete and author actually recommends using `java.time` over `joda`

> Note that from Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK which replaces this project.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Change include the use of `java.time` classes over `joda` classes and the removal of `joda` library as a dependency

### Are these changes tested?

As there is no behavior change, it is covered by the existing tests
* Closes: apache#38578

Authored-by: Laurent Goujon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
dgreiss pushed a commit to dgreiss/arrow that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
…ibrary (apache#38579)

### Rationale for this change

[joda](https://www.joda.org/joda-time/) is a very popular date/time manipulation library for java but the introduction of `java.time` package makes it obsolete and author actually recommends using `java.time` over `joda`

> Note that from Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK which replaces this project.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Change include the use of `java.time` classes over `joda` classes and the removal of `joda` library as a dependency

### Are these changes tested?

As there is no behavior change, it is covered by the existing tests
* Closes: apache#38578

Authored-by: Laurent Goujon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
pribor pushed a commit to GlobalWebIndex/arrow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
…ibrary (apache#38579)

### Rationale for this change

[joda](https://www.joda.org/joda-time/) is a very popular date/time manipulation library for java but the introduction of `java.time` package makes it obsolete and author actually recommends using `java.time` over `joda`

> Note that from Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK which replaces this project.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Change include the use of `java.time` classes over `joda` classes and the removal of `joda` library as a dependency

### Are these changes tested?

As there is no behavior change, it is covered by the existing tests
* Closes: apache#38578

Authored-by: Laurent Goujon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Java][FlightSQL] Remove Joda dependency

3 participants